Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 16:27
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 987
94% 779 Pts
64-Core 1,441
89% 1,441 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 183
Parallax 193
154% 188 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 166
Splatting 115
128% 163 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPI500MWR7 500GB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19050601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1137 1205 1300 1328 1329 246 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,784
Write 1,307
Mixed 1,006
SusWrite 1,091
290% 1,297 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 31.8
208% 86.1 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 792
DQ Mixed 505
474% 738 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 236%
Great: 193%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: VB431D51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1457 1460 1458 1460 1461 1459 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2839
Write 1,448
Mixed 1,316
SusWrite 1,459
392% 1,766 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 65
235% 88.1 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 877
DQ Mixed 761
558% 717 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 306%
Great: 309%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
364GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 84.5
Write 81.7
Mixed 50
SusWrite 85
55% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 32.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 34.8
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback