Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 06:16
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 71.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 286
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 947
90% 747 Pts
64-Core 1,405
87% 1,405 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 182
Parallax 178
153% 183 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 164
Splatting 115
127% 162 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPI500MWR7 500GB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19050601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1042 564 508 294 977 617 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1698
Write 1,282
Mixed 1,001
SusWrite 667
259% 1,162 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 31.3
211% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 785
DQ Mixed 504
473% 736 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 207%
Great: 193%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: VB431D51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1423 1442 1465 1457 1450 1468 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,808
Write 1,455
Mixed 1,322
SusWrite 1,451
391% 1,759 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 64.8
228% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 515
DQ Write 876
DQ Mixed 763
560% 718 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 302%
Great: 309%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
364GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 86 85 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 83.8
Write 79.7
Mixed 45
SusWrite 85.3
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 28.5
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 29
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback