Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 19:55
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 99
1-Core 122
2-Core 237
88% 153 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 622
66% 524 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 119
Parallax 102
94% 112 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 107
Splatting 104
87% 106 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 371 448 465 453 453 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 470
Mixed 346
SusWrite 409
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 46.1
163% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 282
234% 337 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86
200GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 121 120 117 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 85.2
Write 72.5
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 119
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 88%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
61GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 132 130 128 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 115
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 130
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
111GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 92 93 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 92
Write 78.3
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 91.1
60% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 68%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
506GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 175 185 193 191 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 170
Write 183
Mixed 123
SusWrite 185
225% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.3
218% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 24.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 24.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 41.2
97% 41.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,060
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback