Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '20 at 18:08
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 97.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 244
89% 156 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 644
66% 533 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2226 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 126
Parallax 107
98% 118 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 111
Splatting 112
91% 111 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 366 455 463 456 465 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 487
Mixed 445
SusWrite 414
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 61.9
204% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
200GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 120 120 120 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 69.8
Write 75
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 119
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 88%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
61GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 131 130 130 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 110
Write 112
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 130
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
108GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 95 94 93 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 83.9
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 93.6
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55%
Great: 68%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
506GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 176 186 192 192 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 158
Write 172
Mixed 129
SusWrite 183
221% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.8% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 23.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 24.3
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 49.8
80% 49.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,214
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback