Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics90.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '20 at 01:20
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 99
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 624
67% 531 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2127 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 120
Parallax 101
93% 111 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 107
Splatting 107
87% 106 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 408 483 488 466 461 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 488
Mixed 451
SusWrite 433
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 62.5
205% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 370
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86
168GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 116 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 80.5
Write 79.7
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 117
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 88%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
61GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 132 130 130 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 113
Write 117
Mixed 68
SusWrite 130
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
170GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 98 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58% Above average
Read 105
Write 100
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 97.4
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58%
Great: 68%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
510GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 32.5
Write 26.9
Mixed 28
SusWrite 27.4
38% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 23.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 24.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 40.8
98% 40.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,060
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback