Intel X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel X58  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 20:59
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5687
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 170
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 423
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 17
16% 17.5 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 16.8
17% 21 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,853
Write 3,334
Mixed 3,589
801% 3592 MB/s
4K Read 286
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 185
757% 211 MB/s
DQ Read 718
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 591
452% 616 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
219GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 105 106 105 92 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 95.6
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 62%
583 240GB
96GB free, PID 0583
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 125 124 123 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
171% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 125
Mixed 132
SusWrite 125
179% 134 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 31.3
2,442% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 49.7
DQ Mixed 39
3,135% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 171%
Great: 171%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
3GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.8 5.4 4.8 4.8 5.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
6.65% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5
11% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 22%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
24GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 13 17 17 16 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 29
Write 14.7
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 14.3
23% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
93% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-YF8 Hynix HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 Winbond W25X/Q32 68GB
1066, 1066, 33 MHz
16384, 16384, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.7
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback