Intel X58

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Intel Thurley
Motherboard	Intel X58 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180619
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 06 '20 at 03:41
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5660 6,950 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 137 60% 97.3 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 399 41% 333 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C92) CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Lighting 34.1 Reflection 33.3 Parallax 30.2 28% 32.5 fps	MRender 29 Gravity 31.1 Splatting 31.6 25% 30.6 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 240GB 240GB 2,483 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0A SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 239 240 234 239 236 MB/s Performing below potential (88^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	85.9% Excellent	Read 264 Write 254 Mixed 245 SusWrite 237 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 50.4 166% 56.3 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 125 115% 176 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 93%
Seagate BUP Slim GD 2TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 72GB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 6.1 4.6 4.3 3.8 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	2.09% Terrible	Read 5.5 Write 5.3 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 4.5 7% 5.28 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 2.09% Great: 43%
583 240GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 88GB free, PID 0583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 26 27 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35% Below average	Read 30.8 Write 26 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 26.7 38% 28 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 7.5 536% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 171%
JMicron Generic 500GB 261 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 4GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 2 2 2 2 2.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	3.91% Terrible	Read 2 Write 2.3 Mixed 6.3 SusWrite 3.5 5% 3.53 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 3.91% Great: 167%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 669 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 18GB free, PID 2321 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 12.5 Write 12.8 Mixed 11.8 SusWrite 12.8 17% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-YF8 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1066, 33 MHz 16384, 36864 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	20.8% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 5.8 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 22%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X58

CPU
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	64x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	29x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	28x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	10x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	9x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
CS900 120GBPNY $15Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	58x
Winbond W25X/Q32 44GBUnknownBench 38%, 266 samples	31x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $97

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16