Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5687 1,801 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 87 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 133 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 367 38% 303 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300 14,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 0E13) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 1.2 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L2 128GB 1,698 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT04L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 132 133 133 136 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.6% Average	Read 179 Write 218 Mixed 124 SusWrite 132 37% 163 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 19 62% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 124 96% 132 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MXIC 25L8005 49GB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 4266, 33 MHz 16384, 33792 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 10.9 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 10.6 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	193x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	87x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	55x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16