Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 22:45
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User VAT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 758
79% 634 Pts
64-Core 743
46% 743 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.4% Good
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 79.4
Parallax 103
63% 86.4 fps
MRender 76.6
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 64.8
58% 72.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 293 293 301 311 311 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 473
Mixed 430
SusWrite 300
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 48.2
175% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 326
245% 328 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
400GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 281 282 311 357 364 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 506
Write 408
Mixed 382
SusWrite 314
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 24.5
122% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 33.1
82% 168 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 86%
Great: 92%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 301 297 254 191 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 339
Write 106
Mixed 329
SusWrite 256
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 42.4
156% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 220
187% 275 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 102%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 304 302 269 198 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 104
Mixed 347
SusWrite 261
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 40.5
154% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 225
191% 279 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
873GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 176 175 175 173 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 128
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 172
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 25.1
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 24.3
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback