Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '20 at 17:19
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User VAT-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 721
75% 605 Pts
64-Core 749
46% 749 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.4% Good
Lighting 77.3
Reflection 80.7
Parallax 107
63% 88.2 fps
MRender 76.5
Gravity 75.3
Splatting 64.9
58% 72.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 277 277 296 292 302 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 477
Mixed 424
SusWrite 287
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 56.8
189% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 325
245% 329 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
366GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 267 266 304 340 350 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 510
Write 400
Mixed 386
SusWrite 300
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 25.7
128% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 32.5
90% 189 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 92%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
400GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 284 283 249 196 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 430
Mixed 339
SusWrite 248
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 42.1
157% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 218
186% 274 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96%
Great: 102%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
374GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 290 290 246 188 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 416
Mixed 330
SusWrite 250
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 42.6
156% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 225
191% 278 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 181 180 182 182 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 150
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 179
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
WD My Passport 0827 1TB
57GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 57 58 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 57.9
Write 58.8
Mixed 42.6
SusWrite 57.3
73% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 24.9
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback