Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '20 at 10:28
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User VAT-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 742
78% 625 Pts
64-Core 757
47% 757 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.4% Average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 77.8
Parallax 81
55% 75.4 fps
MRender 0.05
Gravity 66.1
Splatting 65
39% 43.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 287 288 306 304 299 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 432
Mixed 411
SusWrite 295
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 54.5
181% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 327
246% 329 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
400GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 283 285 337 371 355 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 455
Write 398
Mixed 380
SusWrite 319
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 24.6
120% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 33.9
85% 174 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 92%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 303 297 239 203 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 402
Mixed 333
SusWrite 255
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 41.4
154% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 215
185% 273 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 102%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 307 303 225 201 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 396
Mixed 340
SusWrite 256
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 39.6
150% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 221
189% 277 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
873GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 173 174 175 175 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 136
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 172
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 25.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 27.3
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback