Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 20:51
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User VAT-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 257
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 717
77% 613 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.7% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 77.8
Parallax 83.7
56% 76.6 fps
MRender 76.2
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 64.9
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 289 286 299 308 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 470
Mixed 432
SusWrite 297
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 55
184% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 326
245% 328 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
366GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 281 285 324 363 354 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 508
Write 421
Mixed 382
SusWrite 314
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 23.8
124% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 37.9
80% 158 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 92%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
400GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 301 298 212 196 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 454
Mixed 348
SusWrite 250
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 42
156% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 218
187% 275 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96%
Great: 102%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
374GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 302 302 262 201 199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 282
Write 116
Mixed 332
SusWrite 260
56% 247 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 42.2
156% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 218
187% 276 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 181 180 182 182 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 140
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 178
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 24.9
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback