Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '20 at 19:37
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User VAT-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 259
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 729
78% 619 Pts
64-Core 757
47% 757 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61% Good
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 80.4
Parallax 91.6
62% 82.8 fps
MRender 76.9
Gravity 74.8
Splatting 64.9
58% 72.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 282 284 297 308 310 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 481
Mixed 352
SusWrite 294
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 38.2
149% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 229
199% 295 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 129%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
400GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 281 284 324 356 361 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 509
Write 422
Mixed 385
SusWrite 315
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 24.8
122% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 33
76% 153 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 92%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
366GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 301 300 227 200 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 445
Mixed 337
SusWrite 253
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 41.8
156% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 217
188% 277 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 102%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
374GB free
Firmware: SBFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 306 304 226 201 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 440
Mixed 336
SusWrite 256
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 42
156% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 218
187% 275 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 182 181 183 184 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 149
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 179
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 25.4
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27.6
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback