MSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7640
MotherboardMSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640)  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateJun 28 '20 at 05:17
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 152
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 441
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 117
Parallax 108
100% 116 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 105
Splatting 89.2
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 542 786 398 396 397 398 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,333
Write 1,018
Mixed 999
SusWrite 486
214% 959 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 77
257% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 582
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 542
409% 548 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 188%
Great: 302%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
67GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 347 425 435 432 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 449
Mixed 313
SusWrite 389
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 34.9
124% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 68
104% 197 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
174GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 127 125 126 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 66
SusWrite 126
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 72%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 190 191 188 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 145
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 181
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
454GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 131 131 129 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 116
Mixed 68
SusWrite 130
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
667, 933, 667, 933 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 13
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640) Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,053
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback