MSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7640
MotherboardMSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640)  (all builds)
Memory16.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 05:09
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 153
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 457
47% 380 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 117
Parallax 119
100% 119 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 105
Splatting 89
88% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 503 766 429 397 396 397 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,344
Write 1,017
Mixed 1,011
SusWrite 481
215% 963 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 76.5
252% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 548
DQ Write 479
DQ Mixed 502
379% 509 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 185%
Great: 302%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
36GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 342 423 437 434 433 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 454
Mixed 312
SusWrite 387
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 35.7
128% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 67.8
103% 195 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
234GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 123 123 124 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 104
Write 106
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 123
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
455GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 133 132 133 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 128
Write 123
Mixed 67
SusWrite 132
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
923GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 194 194 195 194 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 147
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 192
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
667, 933, 667, 933 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.6% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640) Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,053
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback