MSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics94.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7640
MotherboardMSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640)  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 03:53
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 150
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 444
43% 354 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 116
Parallax 110
99% 115 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 106
Splatting 85.8
88% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 399 425 427 427 418 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,326
Write 1,016
Mixed 994
SusWrite 426
210% 941 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 76.8
250% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 543
DQ Write 485
DQ Mixed 503
380% 510 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 180%
Great: 302%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
34GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 348 423 435 361 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 440
Mixed 307
SusWrite 375
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 35.6
126% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 68.2
104% 196 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
234GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 118 123 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 122
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
454GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 131 132 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 126
Write 120
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 132
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
923GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 193 194 196 194 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 143
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 194
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
667, 933, 667, 933 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 12
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640) Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,053
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback