MSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7640
MotherboardMSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640)  (all builds)
Memory16.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 23:25
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 152
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 457
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 117
Parallax 109
100% 116 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 105
Splatting 86
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 693 645 397 396 397 397 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,349
Write 1,012
Mixed 1,006
SusWrite 488
215% 964 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 76
250% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 524
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 486
367% 492 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 184%
Great: 302%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
125GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 123 123 124 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 190
Write 394
Mixed 227
SusWrite 123
53% 233 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 33.9
119% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 91
DQ Mixed 39.1
36% 53.3 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
234GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 123 123 124 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 104
Write 107
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 123
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
455GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 133 132 133 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 131
Write 129
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 132
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
923GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 193 194 193 194 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 148
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 192
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
667, 933, 667, 933 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.6% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640) Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,053
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback