MSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7640
MotherboardMSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640)  (all builds)
Memory15.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJun 08 '20 at 23:25
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 153
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 457
47% 377 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 116
Parallax 109
101% 116 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 105
Splatting 89.7
89% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 517 409 425 424 427 427 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,342
Write 1,016
Mixed 995
SusWrite 438
212% 948 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 77.9
255% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 539
DQ Write 482
DQ Mixed 504
380% 508 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 183%
Great: 302%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
34GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 350 427 440 438 428 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 454
Mixed 310
SusWrite 390
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 35.8
128% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 68.1
104% 198 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
234GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 124 124 124 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 66
SusWrite 124
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
454GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 133 133 133 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 125
Write 128
Mixed 66
SusWrite 132
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
923GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 195 195 194 195 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 148
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 193
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
667, 933, 667, 933 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 43%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640) Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 990FXA-GD80 (MS-7640) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,053
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback