Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 06 '20 at 18:08
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 74
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 98.6
47% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 183
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2018 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 108
Parallax 102
80% 103 fps
MRender 97
Gravity 96.1
Splatting 104
82% 98.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 186 197 198 199 197 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 459
Write 194
Mixed 183
SusWrite 191
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 10.9
72% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 74.3
86% 147 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 78%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 216 220 215 217 215 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 212
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 216
132% 182 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 124%
Great: 121%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
136GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 74.7
Write 80
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 53.7
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.4% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback