Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics78% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '20 at 11:52
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 103
48% 76 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 199
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2009 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78% Very good
Lighting 93.4
Reflection 109
Parallax 93.9
76% 98.7 fps
MRender 97.6
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 103
82% 99.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 156 179 183 180 184 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 356
Write 163
Mixed 147
SusWrite 167
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 10.5
65% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 69.8
84% 147 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 78%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 208 218 217 215 216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 217
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 208
130% 179 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 119%
Great: 121%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
136GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 24 24 25 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 29.7
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 26
17% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.8% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.7
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback