Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 18:05
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 103
50% 77.7 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 206
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2009 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 111
Parallax 106
84% 107 fps
MRender 98.2
Gravity 105
Splatting 105
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 168 192 200 199 203 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 485
Write 190
Mixed 201
SusWrite 183
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 11.7
73% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 73
86% 148 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60%
Great: 78%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 214 219 217 215 216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 212
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 214
132% 182 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 123%
Great: 121%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
154GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 91 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 72.1
Write 81.2
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 92
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 10.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback