Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics87.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 20:03
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 84.6
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 102
52% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 206
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2009 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 111
Parallax 97.6
89% 106 fps
MRender 99
Gravity 105
Splatting 104
85% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 186 194 196 198 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 488
Write 188
Mixed 199
SusWrite 187
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 12
76% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 72.2
86% 147 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 78%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 216 217 215 217 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 221
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 215
133% 182 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 122%
Great: 121%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
154GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 91 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 79.1
Write 75.3
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 91.7
52% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback