bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110323
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 09:57
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3 560
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 126
55% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 188
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$120
Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 40.4
Parallax 38.4
30% 38.5 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 27.4
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 33%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Galax TA1D0120A 120GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 53 25 22 28 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.2% Poor
Read 251
Write 200
Mixed 170
SusWrite 38.9
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 7.5
17% 7.17 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 137
103% 136 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 80%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$56
120GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 89 90 91 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 81.8
Write 79.7
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 89.5
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 13
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 25: 4R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 25% 28 326 250 60 19" 1280 1024 BNQ76C8 BenQ FP93G
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 25: 4R 1G 2B
Typical bin Builds (Compare 16,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $315
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $410Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3070 $568Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $164Nvidia RTX 3050 $298Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback