Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '20 at 19:58
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 745
82% 650 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3003) 3GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.3% Average
Lighting 53.7
Reflection 35.6
Parallax 71.6
44% 53.6 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 54.9
Splatting 44.4
37% 44.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB
239GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 335 420 420 453 463 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 464
Mixed 416
SusWrite 420
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 47.1
170% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 223
201% 304 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 109 116 117 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 386
Write 139
Mixed 190
SusWrite 113
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 42.6
166% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 114
98% 146 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 79%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB
47GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 233 418 416 73 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 476
Mixed 415
SusWrite 271
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 47.3
174% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 223
201% 304 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%
FB160C4081 160GB
57GB free
Firmware: HPF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 60 57 59 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 61.7
Mixed 39
SusWrite 58.4
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 42%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
116GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 130 131 127 131 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 131
Write 27.8
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 126
65% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 75%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
93GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 80 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 86.7
Write 88.3
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 79.9
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 0420 F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback