Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 10:23
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 738
78% 624 Pts
64-Core 762
47% 762 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB
375GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 330 425 424 422 425 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 493
Mixed 414
SusWrite 410
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 47
173% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 220
202% 309 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 114%
Great: 113%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 96 100 99 98 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 431
Write 129
Mixed 184
SusWrite 98.4
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 37.8
159% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 97.8
88% 134 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 79%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB
140GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 317 421 423 423 423 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 482
Mixed 416
SusWrite 407
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 47.3
174% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 223
204% 311 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%
FB160C4081 160GB
57GB free
Firmware: HPF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 63 63 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 62.9
Write 35.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 63.4
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 42%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
90GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 125 126 125 124 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 118
Write 36.8
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 122
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 75%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
102GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 77 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 91.7
Write 84.3
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 79.3
57% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 0420 F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback