Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 10:34
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 290
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 762
81% 646 Pts
64-Core 765
47% 765 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB
375GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 326 415 418 418 418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 472
Mixed 411
SusWrite 403
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 47
174% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 220
201% 307 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 114%
Great: 113%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 115 116 119 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 403
Write 134
Mixed 193
SusWrite 117
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 42
166% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 117
98% 144 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 79%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB
140GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 318 418 416 415 417 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 482
Mixed 414
SusWrite 402
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 47.2
175% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 224
202% 306 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%
FB160C4081 160GB
57GB free
Firmware: HPF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 62 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 64.2
Write 64.6
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 62
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 42%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
90GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 127 123 127 124 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 112
Write 35.8
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 122
63% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 75%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
102GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 89.5
Write 87
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 80
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 0420 F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback