Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 11:53
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 290
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 764
82% 653 Pts
64-Core 763
47% 763 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3003) 3GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1580 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 39
Parallax 73.3
48% 57 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 60.1
Splatting 48
40% 48.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB
373GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 333 423 424 425 424 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 480
Mixed 417
SusWrite 410
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 47.3
176% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 222
204% 314 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 116%
Great: 113%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 110 120 118 122 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 407
Write 124
Mixed 188
SusWrite 118
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 43.3
171% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 118
102% 151 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 79%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB
140GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 332 422 422 422 422 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 469
Mixed 408
SusWrite 409
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 44.3
173% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 222
204% 313 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 114%
Great: 113%
FB160C4081 160GB
57GB free
Firmware: HPF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 53 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 63.1
Write 58.1
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 57.9
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 42%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
90GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 106 106 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 111
Write 26.1
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 104
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 75%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
102GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 80 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 89.5
Write 85.5
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 79.1
59% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 0420 F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.6
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback