Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 10:49
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 290
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 761
84% 665 Pts
64-Core 762
47% 762 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 100%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3003) 3GB
CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1540 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 72
47% 55.9 fps
MRender 36
Gravity 59
Splatting 47.1
39% 47.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB
375GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 234 419 422 422 419 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 469
Mixed 412
SusWrite 392
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 47.3
174% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 224
204% 312 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 114%
Great: 113%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 121 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 404
Write 131
Mixed 170
SusWrite 118
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 41.5
157% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 127
106% 155 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 79%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB
140GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 337 417 419 420 420 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 471
Mixed 413
SusWrite 407
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 47.4
174% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 222
201% 306 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%
FB160C4081 160GB
57GB free
Firmware: HPF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 64
Write 64.5
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 62.4
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 42%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
90GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 111 111 113 110 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63% Good
Read 112
Write 31.7
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 108
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63%
Great: 75%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
102GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 80 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 89
Write 84
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 80.1
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 0420 F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.6% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback