Asus M32CD4-K

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus M32CD4-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD4-K
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170106
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 14 '20 at 06:21
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$89 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80% Very good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 106 2-Core 207 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 412 55% 410 Pts	64-Core 406 25% 406 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% XFX(1682 9560) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1295 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	26% Poor	Lighting 31.1 Reflection 32.8 Parallax 39.1 25% 34.3 fps	MRender 31.6 Gravity 31.6 Splatting 35.1 27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
T-force 1TB 1TB 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 803GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02K0S8FA SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 410 412 412 413 409 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 455 Mixed 432 SusWrite 405 100% 444 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 60.2 195% 69.4 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 147 168% 288 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 129%
T-force 1TB 1TB 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 931GB free Firmware: 02K0S8FA SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 417 413 416 414 419 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 445 Mixed 441 SusWrite 412 100% 445 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 60.5 189% 69 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 147 168% 290 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 930GB free Firmware: MS2OA8K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 133 134 131 138 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 166 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 133 92% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 107%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 196GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 111 112 112 112 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 115 Write 103 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 112 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 70%
33 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 28GB free, PID 0903 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 49 49 49 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 79 Write 49 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 48.5 65% 52.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 2x8GB 1,450 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.5% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 21.4 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 21.8 62% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus M32CD4-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $89Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	395x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	266x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $84Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	207x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	91x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	51x

SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	62x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	49x
SD8SB8U512G1002 512GBSandiskBench 81%, 2,367 samples	21x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	105x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 12GBHynixBench 51%, 2,347 samples	51x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $173

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16