Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$60 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 91.5 2-Core 141 66% 107 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 228 30% 228 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% XFX(1682 9460) CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Lighting 26.2 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 32.9 21% 30.2 fps	MRender 30.8 Gravity 26.2 Splatting 34.4 25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB 16,974 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 64 56 71 60 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Read 433 Write 256 Mixed 302 SusWrite 82.8 60% 268 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 1.1 32% 8.43 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 299GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 151 151 153 152 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Read 152 Write 102 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 152 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-045.A00LF 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	51.3% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 16.2 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	15x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	14x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	11x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
HMT41GU7BFR8C-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 49%, 175 samples	6x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $257