Asrock B75M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B75M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '20 at 16:07
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 138
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 229
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 26.2
64% 26.2 fps
Poor: 17% Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
52GB free
Firmware: UE5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 98 75 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 427
Write 238
Mixed 287
SusWrite 109
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 17
47% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 81.3
DQ Mixed 42.2
48% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
888GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 175 128 101 130 187 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 149
Write 73.3
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 139
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 112%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
8GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.5 5.4 5.5 5.5 5.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Read 25.4
Write 4.8
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.4
10% 9.95 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-045.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 14.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-DGS Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-DGS - $58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback