Asrock B75M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B75M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display640 x 480 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '20 at 12:12
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 178
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 231
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 33.2
21% 30.3 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 34.5
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
88GB free
Firmware: UE5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 121 86 86 86 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 430
Write 295
Mixed 267
SusWrite 128
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 17.7
70% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 42.8
50% 86.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
666GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 168 179 188 188 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 162
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 175
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-045.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-DGS Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-DGS - $58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback