Asrock B75M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B75M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 09:39
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 139
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 214
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 26.3
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 32.1
21% 29.3 fps
Splatting 34.8
36% 34.8 fps
Poor: 17% Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 173 115 46 54 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 398
Write 252
Mixed 222
SusWrite 78.3
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.6
28% 6.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
431GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 165 158 163 167 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 89.9
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 164
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-045.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-DGS Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-DGS - $58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback