Asrock B75M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B75M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display640 x 480 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '20 at 14:25
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 114
62% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 220
30% 220 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 32.3
21% 29.5 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 33.2
25% 29.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
28GB free
Firmware: UE5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 113 43 77 72 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 389
Write 190
Mixed 273
SusWrite 100
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 8
46% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 66.6
DQ Mixed 41
44% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
846GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 132 152 176 162 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 146
Mixed 54
SusWrite 153
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 112%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.4 5.3 5.6 5.4 5.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 5.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 5.4
10% 9.95 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-045.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-DGS Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-DGS - $58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback