Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '20 at 05:15
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 73.1
1-Core 153
2-Core 300
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 917
93% 752 Pts
64-Core 1,412
87% 1,412 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 75.1
Parallax 64.3
61% 71.2 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 71.4
57% 68.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 171 124 95 168 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 445
Write 359
Mixed 314
SusWrite 174
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 37.8
131% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 165
134% 190 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 99%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
78GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 385 384 385 384 384 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 437
Mixed 412
SusWrite 393
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 56.8
188% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 202
145% 185 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
161GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 95 95 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 189
Write 188
Mixed 106
SusWrite 96.1
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
251% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 109%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
466GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 113 112 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 113
Write 106
Mixed 77
SusWrite 112
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
475GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 133 135 134 140 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 143
Write 93
Mixed 71
SusWrite 135
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GVR CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 F4-2400C15-8GVR CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.2% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 28.6
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 28.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback