Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 01:52
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 70.3
1-Core 153
2-Core 276
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 996
96% 788 Pts
64-Core 1,450
90% 1,450 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.7% Good
Lighting 77.3
Reflection 79.9
Parallax 68.6
63% 75.3 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 72
59% 72.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 176 174 175 173 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 445
Write 440
Mixed 370
SusWrite 193
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 39
139% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 199
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 99%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
59GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 386 392 384 384 383 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 448
Mixed 422
SusWrite 392
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 60.2
197% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
104GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 144
Write 112
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 102
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 109%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
466GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 111 112 112 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
63% Good
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 111
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
567GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 136 141 142 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 145
Write 113
Mixed 74
SusWrite 140
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GVR CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 F4-2400C15-8GVR CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.5% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 26.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback