Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 01:45
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 70.2
1-Core 152
2-Core 297
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 993
95% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,427
88% 1,427 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.9% Good
Lighting 78.1
Reflection 80.6
Parallax 69.1
64% 75.9 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 75
Splatting 77.8
61% 74.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 178 176 180 176 177 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 428
Write 441
Mixed 367
SusWrite 177
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 24.3
118% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 136
113% 163 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71%
Great: 99%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
59GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 384 383 384 384 384 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 448
Mixed 428
SusWrite 393
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 99
4K Mixed 60.3
198% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 115%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
104GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 102 103 101 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 136
Write 109
Mixed 74
SusWrite 101
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 109%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
466GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 109 109 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 111
Write 109
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 110
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
567GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 137 142 143 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 145
Write 96.3
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 140
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GVR CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 F4-2400C15-8GVR CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.2% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 25.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 25.3
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $828
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback