Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D18
MotherboardMSI B560M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7D18)  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 13:35
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$112
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 285
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 876
78% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,022
63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
Asus(1043 8810) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 114
Parallax 119
105% 121 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 100
Splatting 83.7
85% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX013N 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,013
Write 1,715
Mixed 844
337% 1,524 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 59.8
185% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,121
DQ Write 610
DQ Mixed 730
579% 820 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 254%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
863GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 47 52 47 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 75.4
Write 25.6
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 44.6
30% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
59% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4W.M16FE1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 28.3
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 26
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B560M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7D18) Builds (Compare 3,452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B560M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7D18)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback