Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '20 at 15:31
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 86.2
1-Core 157
2-Core 310
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 614
8-Core 1190
107% 902 Pts
64-Core 2,193
136% 2,193 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Lighting 93.2
Reflection 84.5
Parallax 79.9
76% 85.9 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 77.5
Splatting 75.6
72% 90.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2272 595 595 613 619 623 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,591
Write 2,340
Mixed 1,507
SusWrite 886
409% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 93.8
318% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,206
DQ Write 836
DQ Mixed 948
727% 996 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 302%
Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 130 142 144 146 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 81.2
Write 135
Mixed 68
SusWrite 141
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
221% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 90%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
575GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 126 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 117
Write 122
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 125
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
90GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 121 117 122 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67% Good
Read 113
Write 50.7
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 120
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67%
Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 152 152 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 182
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 151
98% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
331GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 98 100 101 102 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 73.6
Write 62.2
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 98.7
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 68%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
9GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 9 9.1 7.8 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
4.39% Terrible
Read 5.3
Write 4
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 8.7
8% 5.95 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.39%
Great: 58%
Maxtor 6 L300R0 300GB
32GB free, PID 3507
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 31.6
Write 33.6
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 33.2
43% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.1
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 46.1
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 41.9
123% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 37.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 115%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback