Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '20 at 09:10
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 157
2-Core 302
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,166
106% 888 Pts
64-Core 2,146
133% 2,146 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Lighting 93.1
Reflection 84.5
Parallax 87.2
76% 88.3 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 75.9
72% 90.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2263 601 599 615 620 622 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2597
Write 2,336
Mixed 1,503
SusWrite 887
408% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 70.6
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 77.2
257% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,022
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 458
399% 613 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 269%
Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 138 132 144 146 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 102
Write 123
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 139
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.5
198% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 90%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
572GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 126 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 120
Write 122
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 125
69% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
90GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 120 118 121 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 109
Write 48.9
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 119
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.3
230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 149 148 152 151 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 194
Mixed 31
SusWrite 150
102% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
331GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 111 112 114 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 74.7
Write 73.8
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 111
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 68%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
9GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 7.2 10 7.5 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
4.37% Terrible
Read 5.3
Write 4
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 8.6
8% 5.93 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.37%
Great: 58%
Maxtor 6 L300R0 300GB
32GB free, PID 3507
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 26 28 26 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 30.3
Write 33.5
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 26.9
40% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.1
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 45.9
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 41.9
123% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 38.6
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 115%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,054
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback