Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '20 at 19:07
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$429
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 160
2-Core 318
104% 192 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1230
111% 933 Pts
64-Core 1,713
106% 1,713 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 108%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.8% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 110
Parallax 95
84% 103 fps
MRender 98.8
Gravity 96.7
Splatting 99.3
81% 98.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
723GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 965 1676 1913 1953 1951 1952 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,512
Write 2,265
Mixed 1,470
SusWrite 1735
447% 1,995 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 74.5
250% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,143
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 1,041
789% 1,063 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 332%
Great: 425%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
98GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,348
Write 8,663
Mixed 8,679
1,986% 8,897 MB/s
4K Read 507
4K Write 294
4K Mixed 321
1,336% 374 MB/s
DQ Read 1,470
DQ Write 1,457
DQ Mixed 1,404
1,071% 1,443 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
55GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 196 181 180 183 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 463
Write 208
Mixed 223
SusWrite 183
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 23
92% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 68
DQ Mixed 110
99% 156 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 76%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 500GB
153GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 73 72 72 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 45.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 72
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 88%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
711GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 382 381 383 386 386 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 331
Write 252
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 382
191% 264 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.1
253% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 204%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 28.8
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 30.6
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 51.4
78% 51.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback