Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 15:50
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$429
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,081
101% 839 Pts
64-Core 1,586
98% 1,586 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2314 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 115
Parallax 103
90% 109 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 102
Splatting 104
86% 106 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
741GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1057 1755 1954 2022 2038 2063 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,423
Write 2,278
Mixed 1,455
SusWrite 1815
447% 1,993 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 74.7
254% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,126
DQ Write 1,102
DQ Mixed 1093
827% 1,107 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 336%
Great: 425%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
101GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 461 461 466 456 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 308
Mixed 348
SusWrite 461
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 40.5
143% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 172
179% 295 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 106%
Great: 116%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
55GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 180 219 193 198 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
65% Good
Read 454
Write 136
Mixed 200
SusWrite 192
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 22.7
89% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 57.8
DQ Mixed 111
98% 153 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65%
Great: 76%
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 256GB
102GB free
Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 752 772 760 762 764 764 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 925
Write 751
Mixed 390
SusWrite 762
158% 707 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 41.9
148% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 238
206% 311 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 145%
Great: 160%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 500GB
153GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
40% Average
Read 67.2
Write 41.5
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 72
41% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40%
Great: 88%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
758GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 378 384 384 384 382 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 351
Write 212
Mixed 92
SusWrite 380
188% 259 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
247% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 210%
Great: 213%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
26GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.1 2.6 3.8 4.4 2.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 3.1
6% 4.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
9% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 28.6
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 29.3
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback