Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 18:35
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$429
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 153
2-Core 304
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 992
94% 781 Pts
64-Core 1,656
102% 1,656 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 109
Parallax 95
87% 104 fps
MRender 98.7
Gravity 95.7
Splatting 99.1
80% 97.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
739GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1138 1889 2127 2271 2297 2303 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,538
Write 2,392
Mixed 1,475
SusWrite 2,004
472% 2,102 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 75.7
256% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 1,096
DQ Write 1,072
DQ Mixed 1,046
796% 1,071 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 352%
Great: 425%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
101GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 484 484 484 484 485 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 478
Mixed 357
SusWrite 483
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 41.7
145% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 177
182% 297 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 110%
Great: 116%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
55GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 155 174 196 198 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 473
Write 134
Mixed 216
SusWrite 181
55% 251 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 23.2
92% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 68.8
DQ Mixed 109
98% 156 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 76%
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 801 819 803 797 834 790 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,085
Write 768
Mixed 478
SusWrite 807
175% 785 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 43.6
156% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 471
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 230
206% 319 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 157%
Great: 160%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 500GB
153GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 73 72 71 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 67
Write 40
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 71.7
41% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 88%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
519GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 387 377 384 386 385 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 344
Write 243
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 382
193% 267 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
226% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 208%
Great: 213%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
26GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 1.7 2 3.3 5.5 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Read 6.7
Write 3
Mixed 3
SusWrite 3.2
5% 3.97 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.5
27% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 29.1
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 45.9
SC Mixed 30
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 52.4
76% 52.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback