Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 17:40
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 154
2-Core 308
102% 186 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 1,046
100% 827 Pts
64-Core 1,651
102% 1,651 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 111
Parallax 95.2
86% 104 fps
MRender 99
Gravity 96.7
Splatting 99.5
81% 98.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 256GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,034
Write 660
Mixed 456
158% 717 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 41.1
153% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 475
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 203
187% 295 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 160%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
101GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 445 477 481 480 482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 481
Mixed 356
SusWrite 450
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 42.5
150% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 177
182% 298 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 110%
Great: 116%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
55GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 155 194 209 211 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 471
Write 147
Mixed 207
SusWrite 182
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 22.8
90% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 72.6
DQ Mixed 111
100% 159 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 76%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
954GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2405 2419 2419 2423 2422 2418 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
378% Outstanding
Read 2,521
Write 2,379
Mixed 1,466
SusWrite 2,418
494% 2,196 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 76.1
255% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,111
DQ Write 1,131
DQ Mixed 1,098
832% 1,113 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 378%
Great: 425%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 500GB
153GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 44.2
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 71.5
41% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 88%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
519GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 380 380 383 387 385 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 350
Write 247
Mixed 103
SusWrite 376
195% 269 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
236% 2 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 208%
Great: 213%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
26GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 2.7 2.5 5.4 5.6 3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
2.65% Terrible
Read 7
Write 3
Mixed 3.3
SusWrite 3.5
5% 4.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.65%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 29.3
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 31
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 51.3
78% 51.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback