Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 174 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 321 44% 328 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 844D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 1.31 1% 1.58 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 1.07 Splatting 3.35 2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$62 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 132 124 129 110 127 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.8% Below average	Read 237 Write 218 Mixed 141 SusWrite 134 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 9.1 56% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 69.1 DQ Mixed 18.3 33% 66.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48.9% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 14.1 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	41x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	14x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	7x
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	7x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	8x
99U5584-003.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 8GBKingstonBench 54%, 10 samples	7x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325