Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 650 498 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Memory 63.8 1-Core 44.2 2-Core 86.9 41% 65 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 152 20% 151 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Lighting 66.5 Reflection 65.2 Parallax 57.4 54% 63 fps	MRender 67.4 Gravity 64.5 Splatting 68.3 55% 66.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 63 59 57 63 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.4% Below average	Read 227 Write 153 Mixed 153 SusWrite 60.7 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 15.3 62% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 91.6 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 53.1 55% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 95%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB 6,973 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 183GB free Firmware: HP40 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 63 59 57 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 107 Write 72.2 Mixed 54.8 SusWrite 61.2 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 69%
Generic Mass-Storage 32GB 2,578 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 30GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 15 15 15 15 16 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 15.2 Write 14.5 Mixed 15 SusWrite 14.8 20% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 2.6 192% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 6.5 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X4 650AMDBench 49%, 498 samples	12x
Phenom II X2 B55AMDBench 47%, 662 samples	1x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 4,484 samples	1x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	1x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 5,657 samples	1x