bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BG
Memory19.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120214
Uptime9.5 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 19:28
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 163
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 435
44% 355 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.2% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 59.2
52% 63.3 fps
MRender 69.1
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 54.1
49% 61.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 318 280 142 165 245 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 428
Write 306
Mixed 334
SusWrite 246
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 34.7
117% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 290
215% 287 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 99%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
599GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 95 94 94 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 142
Write 140
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 94
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
174GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 91.7
Write 89
Mixed 51
SusWrite 79.4
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 57%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 16TB
478GB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 134 137 144 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 168
Write 120
Mixed 43
SusWrite 140
150% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
69% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B48583234303043313144332F3847582020 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback