Performance Results

Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory32.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime2 Days
Run DateAug 19 '22 at 17:11
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 62.1
1-Core 135
2-Core 269
82% 155 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 883
84% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,383
86% 1,383 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Asus(1043 05CB) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.7.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 122
Parallax 280
106% 177 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 141
Splatting 193
141% 169 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 115%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 218 235 239 237 236 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 244
Mixed 241
SusWrite 243
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 37
142% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 224
191% 284 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
287GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 172 179 179 176 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 162
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 170
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
130% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 106%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 72 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 86.4
Write 98.1
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 72
61% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.9% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 24.2
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 18.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II Builds (Compare 2,286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback