bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BG
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120214
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateNov 10 '19 at 17:13
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 158
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 411
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 63.7
51% 63.8 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 59.4
Splatting 56
49% 61.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 349 311 252 236 243 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 410
Write 450
Mixed 261
SusWrite 286
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 29.6
106% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 236
199% 290 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 99%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
594GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 94 94 95 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 145
Write 134
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 94.3
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
174GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 86.3
Write 89.3
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 79.7
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 57%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 16TB
478GB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 139 139 142 142 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 156
Write 108
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 137
145% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B48583234303043313144332F3847582020 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.3% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback