HP EliteBook 8460p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8460p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 161C
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '19 at 15:43
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 183
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 441
47% 377 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
HP(103C 161C) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.58 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 474 467 433 431 431 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 438
Mixed 405
SusWrite 452
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 33.4
110% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 364
275% 369 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 131%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
43GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 11 12 11 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 58.5
Write 18.3
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 12
31% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
84% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8460p Builds (Compare 1,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8460p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback